I am seeing some invalid data from SNMP on 5.6d. 10G interfaces will periodically transfer at rates of multiple petabits per second and I am also seeing SNMP reporting 4G RX/TX discards on an interface that reports 0 errors/discards on 'show stat' and 'show int'.
-- Eldon Koyle -- Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away. On Aug 12 10:25+0200, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: > Hello, > > Has anyone tried it yet ? I was planning to do so when I come back next week > but any early feedbacks will be appreciated. > > Best regards. > > > > > Le 1 août 2014 à 02:09, James Braunegg <[email protected]> a > > écrit : > > > > Who wants to test it…. > > > > Kindest Regards > > > > James Braunegg > > P: 1300 769 972 | M: 0488 997 207 | D: (03) 9751 7616 > > E: [email protected] | ABN: 12 109 977 666 > > W: www.micron21.com/ddos-protection T: @micron21 > > > > > > <image001.jpg> > > This message is intended for the addressee named above. It may contain > > privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended > > recipient of this message you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose it > > to anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this message in > > error please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then > > delete the message from your computer. > > > > From: foundry-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 5:14 AM > > To: Skylar MacMinn > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks > > > > Hi all, > > > > 560d is out :-) > > > > Y. > > > > > > > > 2014-07-18 15:47 GMT+02:00 Skylar MacMinn <[email protected]>: > > Thanks for that update J > > > > We updated to 5.6.0.c and have been fine with sflow since. Thanks again to > > everyone who helped point out the issue J > > > > Cordially Yours, > > > > Skylar MacMinn > > www.crissic.net > > Crissic Solutions, LLC > > > > From: foundry-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr > > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 8:43 AM > > To: Josh Galvez > > > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks > > > > Hi, > > > > Little update as 56d GA was postponed until July 31st. > > > > Best regards. > > > > > > 2014-06-20 21:29 GMT+02:00 Josh Galvez <[email protected]>: > > Just an FYI, I've ran in to two rather annoying bugs it the 5.6 line of > > code, this on the XMR. > > > > in 5.6b (but fixed in 5.6c): > > > > Defect ID: DEFECT000502305 > > Technical Severity: Medium Probability: High > > Product: Multi-Service IronWare Technology: Management > > Reported In Release: NI 05.6.00 Technology Area: SFLOW > > Closed In Release(s): NI 05.6.00c(Fixed) > > Symptom: An incorrect raw packet header length in the sFlow protocol is > > observed. > > Condition: Issue is seen while running L3 traffic along while enabling > > sFlow on an interface. sFlow enabled > > interfaces send sFlow data packets to an sFlow collector. At the collector > > the raw packet header > > length is less than what was originally sent. > > > > In 5.6c (not in 5.6b, no fix yet): > > Defect 505978 > > BGPv6 neighborship not coming up over loopback interfaces as the ipv6 TCP > > cpnnection is in SYN-SENT state. > > It will occur if you peer using loopback address with /128 mask. > > It will be fixed in 5.6d which is not released yet. > > Current workaround would be to not use /128 mask or to downgrade your code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 7:48 AM, James Braunegg > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Will be interesting to hear your feedback in a few months !! > > > > Was about to upgrade to 5.5 but maybe it’s worth the wait to see how 5.6d > > is !! > > > > Kindest Regards > > > > James Braunegg > > P: 1300 769 972 | M: 0488 997 207 | D: (03) 9751 7616 > > E: [email protected] | ABN: 12 109 977 666 > > W: www.micron21.com/ddos-protection T: @micron21 > > > > > > <image001.jpg> > > This message is intended for the addressee named above. It may contain > > privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended > > recipient of this message you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose it > > to anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this message in > > error please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then > > delete the message from your computer. > > > > From: foundry-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr > > Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 6:48 PM > > > > To: Wouter de Jong > > Cc: <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks > > > > Hi, > > > > I hope this one will be more mature and stable :-) > > > > Y. > > > > > > > > 2014-05-26 10:26 GMT+02:00 Wouter de Jong <[email protected]>: > > Hi Youssef, > > > > OK, that is the same date I received :) > > > > Regards, > > > > Wouter > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 22:16 > > > To: Wouter de Jong > > > Cc: <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Answering my own post. Just heard from my SE, 56d GA is targeted for > > > July 16th. > > > > > > Best regards. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 25 mai 2014 à 20:34, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <[email protected]> a écrit > > > : > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Interesting... Did TAC give you 56d GA release date ? > > > > > > > > Y. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Le 25 mai 2014 à 12:57, Wouter de Jong <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > >> > > > >> Hi, > > > >> > > > >> (Apologies for not quoting, etc as I don't have the original email in > > > >> my > > > >> mailbox) > > > >> > > > >> Too bad that 5.6 seems 'buggy' ... some of it's new features look nice, > > > and > > > >> I was planning to put it on a new box... > > > >> now I'm not so sure about that any longer... > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Also interesting that you seem to run 5.5d without problems, as we > > > came > > > >> across a bug in 5.5 with regards > > > >> to the IPv6 route cache - DEFECT000500944 > > > >> > > > >> Due to it's characteristics, my guess would be that we really can't be > > > the > > > >> only one that faced that problem ? :) > > > >> > > > >> The issue is that after a link between 2 MLXe's fails and the IGP > > > >> selects a > > > >> different path ... it fails to update the IPv6 cache. > > > >> However, it updates the RIB, etc correctly .... so IPv6 traffic > > > >> transiting > > > >> through the router appears to keep working without issue and > > > >> everything _seems_ correctly (even from looking at CAM), only traffic > > > >> originated from the router itself (eg. loopback) is still pointing > > > >> to the wrong interface, which for example affected IPv6 iBGP sessions > > > in our > > > >> case. > > > >> > > > >> The provided method to resolve it is to manually clear the IPv6 cache > > > by > > > >> running "clear ipv6 cache" > > > >> (Note that 'cache' is hidden in the outout from "clear ipv6 ?" ... > > > >> DEFECT000503937) > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> According to TAC, this issue occurs in both 5.5.x and 5.6.x ... and > > > >> both > > > >> with IS-IS and OSPF. > > > >> In our case, this was on MLXe-4's with 4x10G X-blades, running IS-IS, > > > >> with > > > >> v5.5d and v5.5e > > > >> Fix should come in 5.6d .. not sure in what version 5.5 will be fixed. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Just wondering if anyone else faced this as well ? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Best regards, > > > >> > > > >> Wouter > > > >> > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > >> foundry-nsp mailing list > > > >> [email protected] > > > >> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp > > > > > > > > -- > > Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR > > > > _______________________________________________ > > foundry-nsp mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > foundry-nsp mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp > > > > > > > > -- > > Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR > > > > > > > > -- > > Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR > _______________________________________________ > foundry-nsp mailing list > [email protected] > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
