Hi Eldon,

On which platform did you notice this ? Did you open a case with BTAC ?

Best regards.



> Le 13 août 2014 à 00:50, Eldon Koyle <[email protected]> a 
> écrit :
> 
> I am seeing some invalid data from SNMP on 5.6d.  10G interfaces will
> periodically transfer at rates of multiple petabits per second and I am
> also seeing SNMP reporting 4G RX/TX discards on an interface that reports 0
> errors/discards on 'show stat' and 'show int'.
> 
> -- 
> Eldon Koyle
> -- 
> Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.
> 
>> On  Aug 12 10:25+0200, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Has anyone tried it yet ? I was planning to do so when I come back next week 
>> but any early feedbacks will be appreciated.
>> 
>> Best regards.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Le 1 août 2014 à 02:09, James Braunegg <[email protected]> a 
>>> écrit :
>>> 
>>> Who wants to test it….
>>> 
>>> Kindest Regards
>>> 
>>> James Braunegg
>>> P:  1300 769 972  |  M:  0488 997 207 |  D:  (03) 9751 7616
>>> E:   [email protected]  |  ABN:  12 109 977 666   
>>> W:  www.micron21.com/ddos-protection   T: @micron21
>>> 
>>> 
>>> <image001.jpg>
>>> This message is intended for the addressee named above. It may contain 
>>> privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended 
>>> recipient of this message you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose it 
>>> to anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this message in 
>>> error please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then 
>>> delete the message from your computer.
>>> 
>>> From: foundry-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>>> Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr
>>> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 5:14 AM
>>> To: Skylar MacMinn
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> 560d is out :-)
>>> 
>>> Y.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2014-07-18 15:47 GMT+02:00 Skylar MacMinn <[email protected]>:
>>> Thanks for that update J
>>> 
>>> We updated to 5.6.0.c and have been fine with sflow since. Thanks again to 
>>> everyone who helped point out the issue J
>>> 
>>> Cordially Yours,
>>> 
>>> Skylar MacMinn
>>> www.crissic.net
>>> Crissic Solutions, LLC
>>> 
>>> From: foundry-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>>> Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr
>>> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 8:43 AM
>>> To: Josh Galvez
>>> 
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Little update as 56d GA was postponed until July 31st.
>>> 
>>> Best regards.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2014-06-20 21:29 GMT+02:00 Josh Galvez <[email protected]>:
>>> Just an FYI, I've ran in to two rather annoying bugs it the 5.6 line of 
>>> code, this on the XMR.
>>> 
>>> in 5.6b (but fixed in 5.6c):
>>> 
>>> Defect ID: DEFECT000502305
>>> Technical Severity: Medium Probability: High
>>> Product: Multi-Service IronWare Technology: Management
>>> Reported In Release: NI 05.6.00 Technology Area: SFLOW
>>> Closed In Release(s): NI 05.6.00c(Fixed)
>>> Symptom: An incorrect raw packet header length in the sFlow protocol is 
>>> observed.
>>> Condition: Issue is seen while running L3 traffic along while enabling 
>>> sFlow on an interface. sFlow enabled 
>>> interfaces send sFlow data packets to an sFlow collector. At the collector 
>>> the raw packet header 
>>> length is less than what was originally sent. 
>>> 
>>> In 5.6c (not in 5.6b, no fix yet):
>>> Defect 505978
>>> BGPv6 neighborship not coming up over loopback interfaces as the ipv6 TCP 
>>> cpnnection is in SYN-SENT state.
>>> It will occur if you peer using loopback address with /128 mask.
>>> It will be fixed in 5.6d which is not released yet.
>>> Current workaround would be to not use /128 mask or to downgrade your code.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 7:48 AM, James Braunegg 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Will be interesting to hear your feedback in a few months !!
>>> 
>>> Was about to upgrade to 5.5 but maybe it’s worth the wait to see how 5.6d 
>>> is !!
>>> 
>>> Kindest Regards
>>> 
>>> James Braunegg
>>> P:  1300 769 972  |  M:  0488 997 207 |  D:  (03) 9751 7616
>>> E:   [email protected]  |  ABN:  12 109 977 666   
>>> W:  www.micron21.com/ddos-protection   T: @micron21
>>> 
>>> 
>>> <image001.jpg>
>>> This message is intended for the addressee named above. It may contain 
>>> privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended 
>>> recipient of this message you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose it 
>>> to anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this message in 
>>> error please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then 
>>> delete the message from your computer.
>>> 
>>> From: foundry-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>>> Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr
>>> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 6:48 PM
>>> 
>>> To: Wouter de Jong
>>> Cc: <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I hope this one will be more mature and stable :-)
>>> 
>>> Y.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2014-05-26 10:26 GMT+02:00 Wouter de Jong <[email protected]>:
>>> Hi Youssef,
>>> 
>>> OK, that is the same date I received :)
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Wouter
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 22:16
>>>> To: Wouter de Jong
>>>> Cc: <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.6 feedbacks
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Answering my own post. Just heard from my SE, 56d GA is targeted for
>>>> July 16th.
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>>> Le 25 mai 2014 à 20:34, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <[email protected]> a écrit
>>>>> :
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Interesting... Did TAC give you 56d GA release date ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Y.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Le 25 mai 2014 à 12:57, Wouter de Jong <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> (Apologies for not quoting, etc as I don't have the original email in my
>>>>>> mailbox)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Too bad that 5.6 seems 'buggy' ... some of it's new features look nice,
>>>> and
>>>>>> I was planning to put it on a new box...
>>>>>> now I'm not so sure about that any longer...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Also interesting that you seem to run 5.5d without problems, as we
>>>> came
>>>>>> across a bug in 5.5 with regards
>>>>>> to the IPv6 route cache - DEFECT000500944
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Due to it's characteristics, my guess would be that we really can't be
>>>> the
>>>>>> only one that faced that problem ? :)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The issue is that after a link between 2 MLXe's fails and the IGP 
>>>>>> selects a
>>>>>> different path ... it fails to update the IPv6 cache.
>>>>>> However, it updates the RIB, etc correctly .... so IPv6 traffic 
>>>>>> transiting
>>>>>> through the router appears to keep working without issue and
>>>>>> everything _seems_ correctly (even from looking at CAM), only traffic
>>>>>> originated from the router itself (eg. loopback) is still pointing
>>>>>> to the wrong interface, which for example affected IPv6 iBGP sessions
>>>> in our
>>>>>> case.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The provided method to resolve it is to manually clear the IPv6 cache
>>>> by
>>>>>> running "clear ipv6 cache"
>>>>>> (Note that 'cache' is hidden in the outout from "clear ipv6 ?" ...
>>>>>> DEFECT000503937)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> According to TAC, this issue occurs in both 5.5.x and 5.6.x ... and both
>>>>>> with IS-IS and OSPF.
>>>>>> In our case, this was on MLXe-4's with 4x10G X-blades, running IS-IS, 
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> v5.5d and v5.5e
>>>>>> Fix should come in 5.6d .. not sure in what version 5.5 will be fixed.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Just wondering if anyone else faced this as well ?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Wouter
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> foundry-nsp mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> foundry-nsp mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> foundry-nsp mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundry-nsp mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
> 

_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
[email protected]
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Reply via email to