I'm not sure what revision, but they are 1995 vintage.  I found I/A CAR 7375
which addresses this drift issue, supposedly fixed at revision "W".  I'm not
sure.  It looks like I will end up taking a precision decade box up and
checking the FBMs.  

I appreciate the help on this.

Thanks,
Gaylon

        ----------
        From:  Burness, Phil[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
        Sent:  Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:42 AM
        To:  'Foxboro DCS Mail List'
        Subject:  RE: FBM03 Drift Characteristics

        Any idea what revision of FBM03's you are using? There is a fix in
modules
        (Rev J & above I think) that corrects for thermal drift.

        Phil

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Hicks, Gaylon F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
        Sent: 22 May 2001 17:03
        To: 'Foxboro DCS Mail List'
        Subject: FBM03 Drift Characteristics


        I'm conducting an informal survey in lieu of talking to TAC.  I
would
        appreciate and pertinent information anyone can share.

        First, a little background.  Browns Ferry uses Feedwater line
temperatures
        as an input to our core thermal power calculation during normal
operation
        (it's basically an enthalpy balance calc), and we operate based on
our
        licensed thermal power limits, so we get whatever electrical MWs
output
        based on this amount of steam, river temperature, etc..  If this
number is
        inaccurate, we can lose electrical output, and we appear to be
missing about
        9 MW electric at the moment.  Our Feedwater line temperature is
measured by
        two four-wire precision 100 ohm platinum RTDs on each of two
Feedwater lines
        with a EXTBLK connection to a CHARC block.  We use lab data RTD
specific
        curves for each AIN block (we really, really want this to be
accurate), and
        have these four inputs split between two FBM03s on the same CP.  We
normally
        operate with a FW temperature of about 380 degrees F.

        Over the last year all four RTD measurements have trended downward
about 1
        degree F, which would account for about 2 MW electrical.  I have
been tasked
        with contacting the vendor (Foxboro) to ask if there is any known
failure
        mode or mechanism that would cause these four RTDs on two separate
FBM03s to
        trend downward.  I though I would try the list first to solicit
opinions.
        No derogatory comments please.  I have already expressed my opinion
on this
        subject, but I don't want to bias anyone.

        Again, your patience and any input is appreciated.

        Thanks,
        ==================================================
        Gaylon Hicks
        Tennessee Valley Authority, Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
        Mail Stop PEC-2C
        PO Box 2000
        Decatur, AL  35609
        Phone: (256) 729-7804           Fax:  (256) 729-2047
        email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        FedEx Address:          Shaw Road, Athens, AL  35611
        ==================================================

        
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
        This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company.
All 
        postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no
warranty 
        is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information
disseminated 
        through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold
the 
        list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur
due to 
        your application of information received from this mailing list.

        To be removed from this list, send mail to 
        [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

        
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
        This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company.
All 
        postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no
warranty 
        is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information
disseminated 
        through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold
the 
        list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur
due to 
        your application of information received from this mailing list.

        To be removed from this list, send mail to 
        [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to