Guoqiang Lu,
I just tried this to make sure I wasn't having
any problems, and it works fine on my system.
I tested for values very close to zero, negative
values, and fairly large values, all with no problems.
I ran a side by side comparing the result from your
first example to the result from your second example
and they were an exact match to the four decimals I
was reading across all tests.
Kevin FitzGerrell
Process Control
Fairbanks Gold Mining, Inc.
-----------------original message-----------------------
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 17:30:18 PST
From: "g. lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Step 1: MUL RI01 RI02
Step 2: STM M01
Step 3: OUT RO01
Step 4: End
While RI01 and RI02 are greater than 0, but both M01 and RO01 showed zero!
I have to settle for:
Step1: IN RI01;
Step2: IN RI02;
Step3: MUL;
Step4: STM M01;
Step5: OUT RO01;
Step6: END
Which works as expected.
But "ADD RI01 RI02" seem to work as expected.
This caught me off guard since there are many MUL{ RIxx,ROxx Mxx}, {RIxx
ROxx, Mxx} examples in the manual. Fortunately it did not bump the process.
Any ideas?
Thanks.
Guoqiang Lu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to
your application of information received from this mailing list.
To be removed from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
