On Wed May  3 11:21:27 2000 "Jones, Charles R. (Chuck)" wrote...
>
>You have really opened up a can of worms here, Stan.
>
>We use Integrator 30s at our plant.  They cause a lot of pain in both set up
>and operator usage.  The work is done in the PLC 5s and the I/A is used for
>operator interface.   The Basic Processing Cycle of the AB Gateways is 2
>seconds.  Our CP30s and CP40s have a BPC of 0.5 seconds.

        Why is your BPC so long? Integrator30 loading? If so would going to AB
        Stations make the loading issue better (IE shorter BPC's)?

        That's really this issue that got me started thinking about this. We
        ran inot overun problems on a recent job we did, and had to go back and
        pahes the Integrator 30's. It appears to me that the AB Station should
        be a much higher preformance interconnect here? Am I wrong?

        I recognize that it's basicly a way of getting to only one PLC, unless
        you want to message data between PLC's, which I don't wnat to do. But
        given that my current thoughts are that teh AB station should be a much
        better solutin. 

        But I am open to hearing others expeience, since I have no expirence
        base with the AB Stations at all.

        Thanks for the feedback.


-- 
Stan Brown     [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                    843-745-3154
Charleston SC.
-- 
Windows 98: n.
        useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and
        a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system
        originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit 
        company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition.
-
(c) 2000 Stan Brown.  Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to