On Wed May  3 17:51:03 2000 Daren Bishop wrote...
>
>     Following this discussion, I have noted several things.
>     
>     1. DH+ is basically, for all intents and purposes, Token Ring (56K). 
>     Through a 1770-KF2 CAM (modem) to RS232 Communications to the INT30 to 
>     the node. Bad loss of bandwidth.

        Speaking as someone who has  implemented many PLC-5's with many
        different interfaces let me state my opinion here. In a Integrator 30
        -> 19.2K RS-232 -> DH+ -> PLC-5 linkup, the botleneck, by an order of
        magnitude is the Inetgrator 30.
>     
>     2. Micro I/A performs a ethernet connection to the I/A system with 
>     better processor power and bandwidth, therefore throughput.

        I need to take a look at this. I am not familiar with it at ll.
>     
>     Questions:
>     
>     1. What is the transfer rate through Micro I/A? (10MB)?
>     
>     2. Why cannot we get an FDGW,MDGW or INT30 etc. with an ethernet 
>     adaptor built in?  Something that is fault tolerant that will work 
>     with AB, Modicon, etc. ethernet networks. (Please pardon my ignorance 
>     if I don't see the big deal here)  Micro I/A does it. 

        As long as it had the required prefromance, his would be a hug win. 
>     
>     3. For single PLC applications, why not ethernet communications to the 
>      I/A since most new PLC's support ethernet, and why, for the 56K DH+ 
>     networks, the need to go RS232 before getting to I/A.

        Beacuse DH+ is an AB propritory network, and the KF-2 is the only
        supported way to get on the DH+ that can be used with current
        generation Sun boxes. The alternative (PCMK card) is PC centric.


-- 
Stan Brown     [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                    843-745-3154
Charleston SC.
-- 
Windows 98: n.
        useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and
        a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system
        originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit 
        company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition.
-
(c) 2000 Stan Brown.  Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to