> On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > > However, it had quite low priority the last years because dyn. loaded > > packages > > for a dynamic moving project like fpc with daily snapshots are a real > > problem. > > As soon as one unit interface changes, all dependend packages must be > > recompiled anyways. And usually there are only 1-2 fpc projects running at > > the > > same time on a system so main memory savings are little. > > This is 100% correct. > > On the other hand, for people who use FPC to develop end-user apps, it makes > sense: they will normally not change their installed FPC every 2 months. > > For example: > At work, we have a plugin system which cannot work unless packages are used. > I also think that Lazarus would benefit from it.
Yes, I think it is plug-in systems more than memory or disc saving. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
