> On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > > > On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Dani?l Mantione wrote: > > > > > > > > For clarity: > > > I am not opposing it, but I do consider it a dirty trick in both cases... > > > > Hmm, I don't think neli's one is that dirty, more exotic syntactic sugar. > > Yes it happens with the composition pattern, but is it really worth > > inventing new syntax for? > > What new syntax are you referring to ? You mean the 'absolute' ? > I don't think so...
Depends on implementation. Do you really implement absolute as with same memoryspace here too, or only allow type upgrading (which is the major reason for such feature)? _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
