Marco van de Voort wrote: >> What new syntax are you referring to ? You mean the 'absolute' ? >> I don't think so... > > Depends on implementation. Do you really implement absolute as with same > memoryspace here too, or only allow type upgrading (which is the major > reason for such feature)?
Changing type to something which is not a descendant (and thus incompatible) seems useless and always dangerous to me, so should be forbidden if possible. Micha _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
