On Thursday 28 September 2006 10.54, Chris Cheney wrote: > > The restriction could be subject to a configurable option (perhaps it is > already) but, without a configurable option, the restriction should be > omitted. If the language is changed to suit the whims of the developers, > it might end up as a fine language, but one with no customers. >
Agreed. For me FPC should be a practical tool to build applications in a most productive way. Something like 'friend units' where protected class members are accessible would be useful to avoid the use of 'cracker classes'. Martin _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
