On Monday 02 October 2006 19:20, Micha Nelissen wrote: > Christian Iversen wrote: > >> procedure TTest.DoWithFirst(a, First: Integer); > >> begin > >> First:=a; // ??? > >> FSomething:=First; // ??? > >> end; > > > > Ales, there is _no_ confusion here. Normal scope rules ensures that the > > first line only assigns the param "a" to the param "first". There are no > > other ways to interpret that. > > This is a weak argument. Suppose this were not true, then the language > would be ambiguous (or the semantics undefined)! That would be really > really bad. And people are not robots you know, following, knowing and > applying rules like an exact grammatical rulebook ;-).
I think I might have misunderstood Ales's argument :) -- Regards, Christian Iversen _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
