> Dani?l Mantione wrote: > > But I'll leave this up to the Lazarus team. They have talented developers, > > and I'm sure they are brainstorming about ideas to reduce the exe size. > > However, Lazarus developers do the engineering balancing too and weigh exe > > size against anything else. > > > Another idea is to avoid overlap of features like > - *CriticalSection functions vs SyncObjs
Delphi backwards compat. > - TPairSplitter vs TSplitter Lazarus internal (with previous versions) backwards compat > - TNoteBook vs TTabControl Afaik Laz internal too. > of course this would be provided as packages for who needs This kind of stuff is easily said, but in practice if you change it, some other compability or consistency camp starts complaining. There is a reason for nearly every construct. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
