> > > I also complained and complained about websnap and asp and php, and of > > > course I also wrote some code > > > that solved my problem there which is all FPC based, the poor old wiki, > > > forum, and other utilities > > > on my site that need updating. Others choose the easy solution and use > > > ASP and PHP.. boring. I > > > complained about FPDOC and wrote some extensions for my own lufdoc, and I > > > complained about numerous > > > other things and went ahead and wrote code. > > > > fpdoc is IMHO a good thing, that unfortunately is not fully mature. It > > really needs a circle of dedicated users that report and submit patches. > > Aaaargggh - a knife through my heart :-) > > fpdoc not mature ? > What about the 1700 pages of rtl/fcl documentation it creates ? > I'd rather hope that this is somewhat mature ? I'm not even talking about > the LCL, which will probably be a lot more than 1700 pages when printed...
Nobody disputes the size of docs. I was more talking about not generating a Windows helpformat (on my todo for years), the array [] of ansistring at http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/unix/fpexecle.html not to speak of http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/sysutils/format.html > It does what it was designed to do. It's not perfect, and there are still > some improvements that can be made, but it has steadily improved since > day 1. And will continue to improve in the future. > But alas, as so often, we loose the continuous struggle with time. Which was the exactly what I meant to express.. Needs more continuous struggle from people with a direct interest to not let the improvement rate decrease. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
