On 9/3/08, Martin Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You could use breakpoints and the (dis-)assembler window of MSEide, it lists > mixed pascal and machine code.
Thanks Martin, I'll take a look. What I'm trying to find out (with my rusty assembler knowledge) is if a lot of IFDEF's around procedure calls, compared to only one IFDEF inside a procedure would make a difference in performance and the code generated. I would prefer example 2 (it looks cleaner and would be less work), and from my quick/crude analysis, it seems both options generate pretty much the same code if the gDEBUG define is disabled (does NOT exist). Example #1... procedure Log(AParam1: string); begin writeln('LOG: ' + AParam1); end; var i, j: integer; s: string; begin {$IFDEF gDEBUG} Log('Starting...'); {$ENDIF} s := '%d + %d = %d'; i := 5; j := 2; {$IFDEF gDEBUG} Log('calculating result'); {$ENDIF} {$IFDEF gDEBUG} Log(Format(s, [i, j, i+j])); {$ENDIF} {$IFDEF gDEBUG} Log('Done.'); {$ENDIF} end. versus Example #2... procedure Log(AParam1: string); begin {$IFDEF gDEBUG} writeln('LOG: ' + AParam1); {$ENDIF} end; var i, j: integer; s: string; begin Log('Starting...'); s := '%d + %d = %d'; i := 5; j := 2; Log('calculating result'); Log(Format(s, [i, j, i+j])); Log('Done.'); end. Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel