On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 20:27, Paul Ishenin <i...@kmiac.ru> wrote: > Alexander Klenin wrote: > >> This is not the question of terminology (though I think the proper >> term in this case is "non-reserved keyword"), but of the fact that >> some programs that compiled previously will stop compiling after that >> patch. > > > I don't believe there are programs which have classes with Sealed/Abstract > fields in the published sections without actually declaring "published". > > Even if some exists there will be no mach.
Of course. Still, Jonas is right, this should be mentioned in wiki. -- Alexander S. Klenin _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
