Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Vinzent Höfler schrieb:
Florian Klaempfl <flor...@freepascal.org>:

Marco van de Voort schrieb:
In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said:
This is exactly my point about sealed classes. When you design the
product or class, you have NO way of know what will come in the
future. So you need to stay flexible to change! Yet another OOP
principal that "sealed" tries to prevent!
This might be true, but what's the difference with private etc.?
Private is typically used in nearly every class, sealed in exceptional
cases. At best.
I meant regarding "flexibility". Declaring a member private makes things
also less flexible.
The main difference is that "private" restricts visibility,

It's not only not visible but neither accessible. And if something is
not accessible, it affects flexibility.

whilst "sealed" restricts extensibility. The former is usually a good thing, 
the latter not.


Vinzent.


_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.22/2446 - Release Date: 10/19/09 14:33:00

There is a strange kind - from an academic point of view - of discussion going on here.
- one part is confusing language syntax with compiler optimizations
- another part is driven by not understanding why somebody invented sealed
classes.
The first is or maybe a side effect.
The second should be understood to be restrictive on purpose, by design. I think a lot of people whom I highly regard are focussing in the wrong direction. Sealed has a purpose and a very good one: It prevents OO extensions by design, which is a good thing. see my example from two days ago. And, Marco, this is fully compliant with a true OOP philosofy ;)
just my 2 c
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to