On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Marco van de Voort <mar...@stack.nl> wrote: > Please no. While I directly agree it is better, having incompatible syntax, > specially for minor features is more trouble then it is worth, since > eventually the Delphi syntax will have to be supported anyway. Agreed, and that's quite sad, eventual Delphi syntax support makes FreePascal actually FreeDelphi.
About FPC syntax and new feature: fpc packages (afaik not yet implemented). I'm wondering, what syntax would be used to define an "external" class. Would it follow obj-p (objc branch) style? (adding 'external' keyword after class declaration). thanks, dmitry _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
