Hello Jonas, There're 2 ways to define indirect symbol by the compiler:
tai_const with type aitconst_indirect_symbol or tai_directive with asd_indirect_symbol either way produces identical assembler output: .indirect_symbol %symbol_name So i'm wondering, what was the reason to separate them the same? I know, that tai_const returns a size of the constant, while tai_directive doesn't. Is there anything else? Neither aitconst_indirect_symbol nor asd_indirect_symbol are currently handled by TInternalAssembler. I've modified assembler's loop so it adds additional information to the TObjSymbol. It's not a problem to handle both ways of declaring indirect symbols, i'm just curious. thanks, dmitry _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
