On 10 Nov 2009, at 08:35, dmitry boyarintsev wrote:

There're 2 ways to define indirect symbol by the compiler:

tai_const with type aitconst_indirect_symbol
or
tai_directive with asd_indirect_symbol

either way produces identical assembler output:
.indirect_symbol %symbol_name

So i'm wondering, what was the reason to separate them the same?

I think simply that I forgot that one way was already available when I added the other way :) It's fine to remove either one.


Jonas
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to