On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Paul Ishenin wrote:
21.07.2010 17:28, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Is it an idea to change the 'safecall' convention on Linux/i386 to be
'cdecl + hidden exception handling' ?
How Kylix handles the safecall convention on linux? I think we need to follow
it.
Well,
Safecall = cdecl for Kylix.
Borland decided to do this instead of giving a compiler error.
But since Kylix is long dead, I don't see the need to follow it in this
detail. Or do you know a lot of kylix programs/code/libraries out there ?
We have now the opportunity to make something useful of safecall on unix,
we should take it. The proposal of Joost is the only sensible option IMHO.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
