21.07.2010 17:41, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
How Kylix handles the safecall convention on linux? I think we need
to follow it.
Is it an idea to change the 'safecall' convention on Linux/i386 to be
Well,
Safecall = cdecl for Kylix.
Borland decided to do this instead of giving a compiler error.
But since Kylix is long dead, I don't see the need to follow it in
this detail. Or do you know a lot of kylix programs/code/libraries out
there ?
When (if) codegear release the new linux compiler I think they reuse
their kylix work. So if we follow the kylix way now we will protect the
compiler from the unneeded changes in the future.
Is there a big difference for fpc to call the new calling convention
different and map it to safecall on windows?
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
