Am 29.08.2010 22:48, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
On 29 August 2010 15:32, Dimitri Smits wrote:
You're free to choose one over the other; Personally, I favour
fpc-unit style.
I find it works most easily, definitely if you use Lazarus.
so, lpi files and the like are acceptable in fpc?
I think he means that there is a GUI unit test runner for fpcunit
included with Lazarus (and fpGUI by the way). As for the .lpi files, I
don't think those belong in the FPC project source. FPC and Lazarus
are separate projects, not everybody using FPC use Lazarus. After
all, all IDE's worth using, should have a feature to create a IDE
Project File from a program unit. I know Lazarus IDE and MSEide can do
this - so that again indicates that a specific IDE project file
doesn't need to be in the FPC source code.
LPI files are already included with FPC. E.g. for the compiler itself
(so you don't need to add all search paths manually...) and for the
Win32 RTL (excluding the system unit).
No autogenerate system will add the correct searchpaths by itself, so
some file must be included for that system. So why not use the LPI file...
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
