Marco van de Voort schrieb:
A more grave reason though is that Delphi does not have low() and high() on sets and a request to add it by me in 2006 was closed with their equivalent of "won't fix".
I wonder how FPC defines low() and high() for sets. The static bounds can be obtained from the underlying enumerated or subrange type, even in Delphi. So it would only make a difference, when FPC sets would track the actual (dynamic) first and last element in an set, with special handling for empty sets where both low() and high() cannot return valid values.
DoDi _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
