On 11/14/2010 09:47 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
I wonder how FPC defines low() and high() for sets.
IMHO it should not. An "in" loop on sets should not use a defined sequence. Relying on on an "order" of the elements of a set mathematically is erroneous.
-Michael _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
