Am 13.03.2011 22:14, schrieb Sven Barth: > Am 13.03.2011 16:40, schrieb Florian Klämpfl: >> Am 13.03.2011 11:26, schrieb Sven Barth: >>> I'd like to know how I should proceed >>> regarding these (and possible also the first two, as they might take >>> their time as well ^^ ). >> >> Implement things as those were fixed. >> > > Do you mean "as if those were fixed"?
Yes. > >>> As I don't think it's a good idea to put the handling in TSymtableStack >>> itself I basically have the following solutions left: >>> * add events that are triggered on push/pop to TSymtableStack >>> * make push/pop virtual methods and subclass TSymtableStack >>> >>> In the first case I might need to introduce a "factory function" that >>> creates an TSymtableStack and sets up the two events. In the second case >>> we need to agree that all symtablestacks (maybe except the stacks for >>> macros) must now be created as the new subclass. >>> >>> Hmm... rereading what I wrote above I personally would go for the second >>> solution. >> >> I'am not a big fan of eventing in the compiler: event based designs are >> fine for libraries, but for the compiler typically not needed. > > That's why I asked. So the second solution then? IMO yes. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
