In our previous episode, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho said: > And why would the interfaces change in the other proposal?
> It is only > 1 more overloaded option for the routines, Which is just 1 more interface change. And for something that is a temporary workaround. That is what I like on Mattias proposal, it is mostly hidden in implementation, and the declaration and setting of the "manager" can have a lot of platform and deprecated directives around it to make it clear that it won't last, and it is not just for lazarus. I assume it is windows only. But I really do wonder if this is necessary, since it will already not make the 2.6 cycle anymore, and I hope 2.8 can be really unicode. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
