On Friday 14 October 2011 14.19:35 Michael Schnell wrote: > On 10/14/2011 10:30 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: > > BTW2, the Lazarus IDE has big problems with the lack of dynamically > > loadable packages, which still are *not* supplied by FPC. This will > > possibly make impossible above separation between the IDE > > implementation and FPC progress. Wouldn't it be much more important to > > improve the package support, before experimenting with new Delphi > > features? > > Of course, Dephi-type runtime packages (i.e. DLLs / so's specially > crafted to be only used by programs done in the same language and using > the same libraries) are a desirable feature (e.g. to do "plugins" in > closed source projects), I feel that it's not a big lack regarding the > IDE. (At least in Linux) re-compiling the IDE is done in a few seconds, > so adding/deleting/replacing static packages is no hurdle. > Ever tried to implement a form or any function which uses dynamic types or common application elements in a dll/so?
Martin _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
