On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Jonas Maebe <jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be> wrote: > He did not expose any holes in any argument. He simply said that Go32v2 and > OS/2 can be ignored as far as any potential implementation problems are > concerned because Go32v2 and to a (much) lesser extent OS/2 do not support > various features. I strongly disagree about the OS/2 part because its target > support is still actively maintained, so the least courtesy we can do is to > try to accomodate it rather than simply upfront state "if it doesn't work > for your target, tough luck".
I don't see any loss of the OS/2 FPC community if 1 routine won't work for them, supposing it is really impossible to implement it there. Will things be better for the OS/2 FPC community if instead of only OS/2 not having NowUTC noone has? And to put things into their real perspective, what is the proportion of OS/2 users in the FPC community? From source forge I'd say 0,005% or less -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
