On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
Well, you'll have to convince Marco.
But I think it's that time of the month, when he's hard to convince,
just for the fun of discussion :)
Strange. I had the same feeling. Something random functionality HAD to be
put in, damn the consequences or counter arguments.
Not quite.
If we're talking about clock_gettime, that was on my agenda since Zeljko
pointed out
their existence, as I stated in my initial post: "it is on my todo list".
Then also add the getres. Without it is useless, or will lead to bad code
that makes assumptions about granularity.
That was the intention. Simply adding definitions for
int clock_getres(clockid_t clk_id, struct timespec *res);
int clock_gettime(clockid_t clk_id, struct timespec *tp);
int clock_settime(clockid_t clk_id, const struct timespec *tp);
to the linux unit, as per the linux man page for these calls. No more, no
less.
Done. Revision 19789.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
