Am 09.12.2011 16:19, schrieb Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Marco van de Voort<mar...@stack.nl> wrote:
It is something else to avoid the core system getting to entangled with
libc, but that doesn't mean I want to reimplement all libc of all unixy
platforms and maintain that.
Why do we provide our own memory manager anyway? Just kill it and ship
cmem only.
fcl-image? kill it in favor of the bindings to ImageMagick.
WriteLn? The platform probably already has printf...
Your statements (except the fcl-image one) contradict Marco's statement
"to avoid the core system getting to entangled with libc".
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
