For that reason there is no speed difference between using a UTF-16 or UTF-8 encoded string. Both can be coded equally efficient. ============== No in common, since UTF-8 needs error handling, replacing for unconvertable bytes etc operations which may effect initial data which makes per-byte comparision unreliable. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode ... Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode ... Martin Schreiber
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode ... Ivanko B
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode ... Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode ... Ivanko B
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode ... Martin Schreiber
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode ... Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode ... Daniƫl Mantione
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode ... Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode ... Martin Schreiber
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode in the RTL (m... Ivanko B
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode in the RT... Ivanko B
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode in the RT... Mattias Gaertner
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode in the RT... Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode in the RTL (my ideas) Graeme Geldenhuys
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode in the RTL (my id... Hans-Peter Diettrich