Ivanko B schrieb:
For that reason there is no speed difference between using a UTF-16 or UTF-8 encoded string. Both can be coded equally efficient. ============== No in common, since UTF-8 needs error handling, replacing for unconvertable bytes etc operations which may effect initial data which makes per-byte comparision unreliable.
When dealing with floating point values you don't bother with their encoding of sign, exponent and mantissa. Why do you want to do such low-level bitfiddling with strings?
DoDi _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
