Michael Van Canneyt <mich...@freepascal.org> hat am 5. März 2013 um 11:09 geschrieben: > > > On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Sven Barth wrote: > > > Am 05.03.2013 10:58, schrieb Henry Vermaak: > >> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:41:37AM +0000, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > >>> Sven Barth wrote: > >>>> Am 05.03.2013 10:14, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd: > >>>>> But on the other hand, if an application programmer could > >>>>> disable FPC's unit handling and use make -j instead, choosing > >>>>> to pay the price of difficult maintenance, it might defuse the > >>>>> criticism coming from certain quarters. > >>>>> > >>>> Make can not figure out the dependencies between units by itself > >>>> as it would need to parse them. > >>> That's for the user to do, if he thinks he can do a better job than FPC. > >> Or implement an option that spits out the dependencies for make, so that > >> the user doesn't have to do this. > > As this is something we (as in the FPC developers) don't need: patches are > > welcome. > > > > [or you could try whether the ppdep tool still works: > > http://www.freepascal.org/tools/ppdep.var ] > > There is a new tool "pas2fpm.pp" which can easily be adapted to do this. > It already calculates the dependencies, but outputs them in fpmake form.
Is this correct: You need the tool pas2fpm to feed the tool fpmake to feed the tool fpc to feed linker, lazres .... Mattias _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
