Am 24.03.2013 22:26, schrieb Sven Barth:
I don't know immediately how you can differentiate between anonymous
types and named ones, but that would be the key difference.
Since the function building the name usied to access the RTTI table uses
only the smytables to decide weather the type is annonymous or
referenced by it's name I thought that approach was ok.
(symdef.pas 1434)
function Tstoreddef.rtti_mangledname(rt:trttitype):string;
...
if assigned(typesym) and
(owner.symtabletype in [staticsymtable,globalsymtable]) then
result:=make_mangledname(prefix,owner,typesym.name)
else
result:=make_mangledname(prefix,findunitsymtable(owner),'DEF'+tostr(DefId))
end;
Or are nested types also referenced by the definition id?(I had
something on my mind like Unit Type SubType with some seperators("$") in
between)
Also if you should do a bug report please reformat your patch first,
so that it adheres to the compiler's format style (and don't change
the formatting of other code like the one in the case except for
overall indentation). E.g. for the above code from your patch
Is there some template to use with code tools oder some formatter you
use.(For this I think I can manage manually but if further issues
arrise. It would be better to know if there an easier way to do this^^)
mfg Necem
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
