Am 24.03.2013 22:49, schrieb Steve Hildebrandt:
Am 24.03.2013 22:26, schrieb Sven Barth:
I don't know immediately how you can differentiate between anonymous
types and named ones, but that would be the key difference.
Since the function building the name usied to access the RTTI table
uses only the smytables to decide weather the type is annonymous or
referenced by it's name I thought that approach was ok.
(symdef.pas 1434)
function Tstoreddef.rtti_mangledname(rt:trttitype):string;
...
if assigned(typesym) and
(owner.symtabletype in [staticsymtable,globalsymtable]) then
result:=make_mangledname(prefix,owner,typesym.name)
else
result:=make_mangledname(prefix,findunitsymtable(owner),'DEF'+tostr(DefId))
end;
Somehow I have the feeling that this should be corrected...
Or are nested types also referenced by the definition id?(I had
something on my mind like Unit Type SubType with some seperators("$")
in between)
Looking at the code above you could try whether "typesym" of the
procvardef is assigned if it is a named one.
Also if you should do a bug report please reformat your patch first,
so that it adheres to the compiler's format style (and don't change
the formatting of other code like the one in the case except for
overall indentation). E.g. for the above code from your patch
Is there some template to use with code tools oder some formatter you
use.(For this I think I can manage manually but if further issues
arrise. It would be better to know if there an easier way to do this^^)
No, there is none. Also there isn't a completely fixed formatting (yet),
because some parts of the compiler are from times where there wasn't a
specific formatting yet. I myself am doing the formatting manually,
because for my own projects I prefer a different one (that's also why
I've reported this Lazarus feature request:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18517 )
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
