Am 24.02.2014 12:37, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 02/24/2014 11:54 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
We don't have an embedded target yet and for the two OS you mentioned the RTL would need to be ported (or at least mostly stubbed).

Of course.

At first, for a proof of concept, I would just try to use some simple pascal functions and call them by a gcc function and have the pascal project call some gcc functions.
Yes.

For useful work in my project, I would need strings and with that of course heap.
Here you'll basically need the initalization from the system unit. For Linux for example the entry point is located in $fpc/rtl/linux/m68k/prt0.as which calls PASCALMAIN (that's the main code of the program file). At first that initializes all units (including system) by calling fpc_initializeunits. In the system unit initialization the heap is then initialized and that should normally be sufficient for using strings (though the atomic functions will need to be implemented as well if you want to use multi threading ;) )

I suppose I can (and need to) create the appropriate RTL functions for providing a heap to the user code by forwarding the call to malloc/free and friends in the C RTL (which I of course have).
You could either write a custom heap manager (similar to cmem which simply calls malloc/free from the C library), but you'd still need to keep the initial heap usage for initialization of the system unit in mind (except you replace the default heap manager functions inside the system unit). Otherwise you'd need to implement the SysOSAlloc and SysOSFree functions usually located in $fpc/rtl/OS/sysheap.inc (for Linux the location is $fpc/rtl/unix/sysheap.inc) to get the heap to use your C library functions.


As you use GNU C then the calling convention used should hopefully be the same as for Linux though you might want to check whether it's using A6 or A5 as stack frame register.

The calling convention with C is (as well for gcc, as for the old MRI compiler I used before, as well for 68K-"CPU32" as for FIDO:

A7 = Stack
A6 = call frame (handle by LINK / UNLNK instructions
D0, D1, A0, A1 can be modified by the called function
D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, A2, A3, A4, A5 need to be restored by the called function all parameters are pushed to stack as 32 Bit values (some compilers might allow for word parameters to be pushed as 16 Bit value, but I don't use this), normal C-Call pushing order
The stack is cleared up by the caller after the call
That's good. That's the same ABI that Linux uses.


If you want to play with it nevertheless, the necessary parameters should be -O- -Cp68000 (or maybe also 68020) and you'll need the binutils for that target. You could for example compile a simple unit that just contains functions/procedures (without managed types, no RTL usage!) for m68k-linux (with the above mentioned parameters)
That is exactly what I am up to right now. (AFAIK, "CPU32" and FIDO in fact provide most ASM features of 68020 - but no MMU - , so maybe "68020" might be appropriate. But I can't provide the "binutil" API to the pascal project, but just some dedicated RTL features I would be able to do myself)
FPC itself does not need to care for MMU or no-MMU. ;) What do you mean with the "binutil API"?
In the end I supposedly will want to create a mechanism of "loading" a Pascal "program" using the running C project as a kind of "boot loader", e.g. doing the necessary recalculation of non-relative addresses.
Yes, currently FPC can not generate m68k PIC code, so something like that will be necessary.

Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to