On Fri, May 2, 2014 08:47, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > On Thu, 1 May 2014, Tomas Hajny wrote: > >>> >>> I had thought about this. In general, I try to take care of this >>> concern, >>> since it is my concern as well. >> >> What do you mean that you try to take care? Will you try to re-align >> the two and e.g. send the latest improvements to Lukas Gebauer? I'm >> ready to test proper working of my OS/2 support related changes added >> earlier to Synapse once they get merged to the FPC tree. ;-) > > I merged the synapse version to the FPC tree; that took some work. > The FPC tree differs meanwhile too much, it would break existing > code if we just copied over the file.
Sure, I understand that just copying the file over isn't the right solution now. If I may suggest, I'd at least mention in comments the Synapse SVN revision to which the synchronization has been performed so that future re-sync efforts may be limited only to differences since the mentioned revision. What was your key for deciding which changes to include and which not? As an example, the OS/2 support mentioned above has apparently not been merged by you. I can obviously do that part myself, but I wonder if there is some other stuff which you decided not to include. Do I understand it correctly that you do not intend to provide the FPC extensions to Lukas Gebauer? I would probably try to do it myself in that case. Tomas _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
