On Fri, 2 May 2014, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2014 08:47, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Tomas Hajny wrote:
I had thought about this. In general, I try to take care of this
concern,
since it is my concern as well.
What do you mean that you try to take care? Will you try to re-align
the two and e.g. send the latest improvements to Lukas Gebauer? I'm
ready to test proper working of my OS/2 support related changes added
earlier to Synapse once they get merged to the FPC tree. ;-)
I merged the synapse version to the FPC tree; that took some work.
The FPC tree differs meanwhile too much, it would break existing
code if we just copied over the file.
Sure, I understand that just copying the file over isn't the right
solution now. If I may suggest, I'd at least mention in comments the
Synapse SVN revision to which the synchronization has been performed so
that future re-sync efforts may be limited only to differences since the
mentioned revision.
Now you are assuming that I know this version :-)
What was your key for deciding which changes to include and which not? As
an example, the OS/2 support mentioned above has apparently not been
merged by you. I can obviously do that part myself, but I wonder if there
is some other stuff which you decided not to include.
I merged what I needed. It was not a 'concerted effort'.
Do I understand it correctly that you do not intend to provide the FPC
extensions to Lukas Gebauer? I would probably try to do it myself in that
case.
They are not so much extensions (although there are a couple, I assume),
just some cases where things have been done differently.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
