On 09/22/2014 02:51 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Then you should also not use interfaces, strings and arrays, because
they use the same mechanisms.
Yep. The advanced developer should know what he is doing.
What us confusing there?
Of course I do know the pitfalls.
If fpc would provide a syntax for "parallel loop" and "future variables"
e.g. similar to what Prism offers, even more inexperienced users will be
inclined to use (invisible) threads. I suppose it's not possible to
avoid the "confusion" that is introduced by this, but it should be
limited as much as possible. (No idea how.)
-Michael
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
