In our previous episode, Michael Schnell said:
> Nonetheless to me it seems rather silly that they offer a dedicated
> language construct ("parallel for" / "future") with Prism and suggest
> using another language construct (anonymous method) for exactly the same
> purpose with Xe8.
Prism, as Sven said was by Remobjects, and only "inspired" by Pascal, and
undoubtedly they simply tacked on a common .NET/c# feature there.
I never saw much synergy in Prism with either FPC or Delphi.
> Regarding fpc, I am aware that "anonymous method" had been discussed
> here. I did not take a deeper look into same.
IMHO no discussion is necessary besides the bugreport where you added the
patch :-)
> Is / will the syntax be the same as with Delphi ?
Of course, we are a delphi compatible
> Will the fpc library provide the appropriate classes for doing
> "TParallel.For" as described ?
That will depend on when you submit that patch :-)
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
