Am 02.03.2016 02:28 schrieb "Maciej Izak" <[email protected]>: > > 2016-03-02 0:48 GMT+01:00 Maciej Izak <[email protected]>: >> >> >> RTTI table in most of cases includes also most of INIT table data (probably full copy). >> > > sidenote: at the moment the generation of RTTI table does not make sense. INIT table is sufficient also for exploring record RTTI by TypeInfo.
As I already wrote it's not. The INIT table is a subset that only includes managed fields while the RTTI table also contains unmanaged ones. This way the helpers don't need to work through larger records that only contain primitive types. If that isn't the case then *that* is a bug. Regards, Sven
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
