2016-03-02 11:10 GMT+01:00 Sven Barth <[email protected]>: > One could say that in case of FPC the name "ManagedFldCount" isn't quite > correct ;) > Maybe is good idea to adjust this? Storing unmanaged fields info as managed fields in RTTI table is a little confusing... There is no gain from storing unmanaged fields in that way. Any additional RTTI information for records should be stored in separated place. For now we have:
-Incorrect generated RTTI table with confusing naming -More incompatible Delphi RTTI -Bigger RTTI table -For low level solutions is required additionally (unintuitive) check to confirm field stored inside managed fields array as managed field (!sic) :\ we should do the things in proper way. that can't be explained as "by design". -- Best regards, Maciej Izak
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
