Op 11-08-18 om 10:22 schreef Christo:
In my mind it was easier to think of subarch/abi options as extending the target concept, so each valid combination of CPU-OS-SUBARCH-ABI results in a unique target, which ends up in a separate directory. This concept seems to fit in well with the current concept of target=CPU-OS and requires minimal changes on both the Makefile side and fpmake side.
As said, i did not really look into your changes. I had Florian's directory layout in mind. Maybe this is also an idea. Florian, what do you think?
This is a bit different to how Florian started his modifications, which was CPU-OS/SUBARCH-ABI. This created some bifurcation in directory & file name conventions, hence my suggested approach above. Note that I am not familiar with the details of fpmkunit. I've looked at lcl/interfaces and here it seems as if each variant has its own list of units required. In this case most/all of the required units stay the same, it is just the used compiled unit paths and unit/binary output path that would differ. I'm sure I'm missing something about the way PackageVariants are supposed to work.
PackageVariants can do more than you need, that's true. You only have to define some additional compiler-parameters, and search-paths, the rest will be done automatically.
Regards, Joost. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
