I accidentally replied to this one via the main thread. It's my most recent message before this.
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 9:19 AM Alexander Grotewohl <a...@dcclost.com> wrote: > Not to mention the users who pick up FPC and have to port what they've > previously learned. That information is useful even if the code isn't > already written. > > > On 11/4/2018 7:41 AM, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote: > > On 11/3/18 7:09 PM, Ben Grasset wrote: > >> (The same could be said about the various other wildly outdated bits of > >> information on the overall site and the fact that it gives > >> now-hugely-irrelevant topics like "porting from TP7" such precedence, > >> but > >> that's a different issue.) > > > > porting from TP/BP 6/7 is still fairly relevant... maybe not in your > > part of the universe but it is definitely relevant for others... in > > one development directory here there are well over 500 pas and inc > > files needing porting... no clue at this time the number of LoC in > > those files but it is a lot more than those with the porting task > > really want to know about else it set a daunting task ahead of them... > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel >
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
