On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 2:37 PM Martok <list...@martoks-place.de> wrote:
> In any case, FPC's cmem on Win32 calls into mscvrt, and that is so slow > that I > killed the test code after a couple of minutes, where even FPC-builtin was > done > after 10 seconds. > Interesting. On Win64 I've found it to be consistently faster. Also, the cmem unit changed to call into a copy of Jemalloc.dll (i.e. je_malloc instead of malloc and such), something I've experimented with, is WAY faster. On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 2:43 PM Jonas Maebe <jo...@freepascal.org> wrote: > That is incorrect. I didn't mean that it doesn't *care* about being fast, but more that it will not necessarily use more memory in all cases that it might result in a speed gain, and generally is more concerned with a "balanced" approach, which is what I've always heard to be the case. Is that really not true at all?
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
