On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 8:48 PM Ben Grasset <operato...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Of course not. That would be rather nonsensical, *for very obvious > reasons*, that I've already gone out of my way to address in this comment > chain. It is however utterly ridiculous to directly correlate that with > `^Type` syntax, as they are only related in the most vague of ways. > If such declaration would be ok: function DoSomething (a: ^Integer; b: Pointer): integer; Should the flowing code (inside of DoSomething body) be ok as well? ((^Integer)(b))^ := a^; (keep in mind that ^A ... ^Z is also a character escaping) thanks, Dmitry
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
