On 02.08.2019 21:36, bla...@blaise.ru wrote:
embed a copy of the body of insert_struct_hidden_paras into TVMTBuilder.generate_vmt, then merge those two procdef-member traversals into one (hey, performance!)
Would you guys oppose such a change? Then we could rename insert_struct_hidden_paras back to insert_record_hidden_paras :) Aside from performance, I would like it for closures (for their nameless methods, the insertion of hidden parameters cannot be deferred until the VMT generation). Also, handle_calling_convention would need to be changed not to indirectly rely on current_filepos, but I see that as a bonus: the trick of swapping current_filepos could be removed from its callers (namely, insert_record_hidden_paras). -- βþ _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
