On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:53 AM, Codebue Fabio - P-Soft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Take a look to a new Firebird 2.1 next month and probably you will change > your idea about it... > UDF: FreeAdHocUDF, a lot of internal SQL function... > and if you wanna a good book www.ibphoenix.com Helen Borrie book... a > MUST! > > Will 2.1 have a true auto increment attribute? A boolean field perhaps? Those are the only things that I miss when using FB. I am aware that all of these issues can be resolved by using generators/triggers and a validating domain. That is what I like about MySQL, MSSQL and others that are missing from FB. Do not misunderstand though. I've used FB for 8+ years with great success in embedded, small and large transactional systems without flaw. Never had a corrupt DB. AFAIK, never had a corrupt backup. Most of the time, I deploy FB on Linux servers and backup using gbak. Tom
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
