Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > On 21 February 2010 17:00, Michalis Kamburelis <michalis.ka...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Which also means "less chance of mistake". For example, if you decide >> later to change "y" to "y1", you only have to change the code in one >> place, not three. > > > Unfortunately you are wrong Michalis. Ever heard of 'syncron-edit'? > > http://wiki.freepascal.org/New_IDE_features_since#Syncron-Edit > > You only need to change one variable, and all other instances will > change to. And syncron-edit applies to any selection of text. So > already works in more cases. >
Which is cool, but only if you and all your contributors use Lazarus for all your editing. The fact that Lazarus makes something easier should not be a reason to reject the language feature. > > I vote against adding this language feature. It's not pascal-like and > actually makes the code harder to read. It also only applies to simple > assignment. Case begin..end blocks can do much more than simple > oneliners. > This is a matter of taste, I can imagine uses when at least functional "if" would make code *more* readable. Noone forces programmers to convert all their case/if to functional versions if they look unreadable. The functional variants are supposed to be used in particular situations, when they make sense. Mind you, I'm not saying I'm a fan or a big proponent of this feature. I do not own Delphi since a long time, being happy with FPC, so I'm also not interested in compatibility. Mostly, I'm playing devil's advocate here :), and I didn't see yet a good argument against this feature (and I see cases when it would be useful). The fact that it makes some cases less readable doesn't count here imho (because it's optional, and can make other code more readable). Michalis _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
