Andrew Pennebaker schrieb:
Yes, there is a distinction to be made between an interpreted
environment, say, GHCi, and instantfpc, which is simply a compiler
wrapper just advanced enough to let you ./ your Pascal programs.
But hiding away the compilation step from the user does not turn a
compiler language into an interpreter language. There is no benefit in
doing so. You can simply compile your programs and then use the
executable in your scripts. Where is the problem? Why insist on doing
this in the background?
> With a little more work, instantfpc could become an interpreted
environment.
I doubt that. It was not made for this.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
